The interesting thing about the girl on the ferry is that it is the one colour photo in that set where I didn't use Classic Chrome. tone curve, boosting clarity, and dropping shadows or boosting de-haze slider. The B&W photos were all done in LR typically by using a med. I think all the colour images had Fuji's Classic Chrome simulation applied to them in Lightroom except for one. I'm a big fan of RNI films.Ĭlick to expand.Thx. Import those dng files into LR and process as you like - the Fuji film sims are still available in LR (or its own version of them) as are all plug-ins.
At this point I tend to just delete the RAFs on the card as I no longer have any use for them. Use IT to convert the RAFs on the SD card, leaving them on the card as dng files.
#Iridient x transformer classic chrome profiles full#
dng files which can be imported into LR (allowing full plug-in use) and whilst it's not quite as good as C1, it's as close as I need and a definite improvement over Lightroom.įrom SD card: Open up Iridient Transformer (IT) The IQ it drags out of Fuji RAFs cannot be argued with though.įor the last 6 months I have used Iridient Transformer to convert Fuji raws to. I also have Capture One (full version) and this is stunningly good, although for someone who's so much more familiar with LR its workflow (cataloguing especially) isn't as intuitive. The worm artefacts aren't as prominent, but it still struggles with foliage to the extent that I don't use it at all for woodland photography. I'm running the latest version of LR and whilst it's an improvement on earlier ones, it still doesn't really show what X-Trans raws are capable of.
To throw my hat into the ring re Lightroom's handling of Fuji RAFs:
0 kommentar(er)
